论文→[ 其他论文 ]

农渔会信用部对全国农业金库制度信任之研究

阅读量:02021-12-29作者:王志文来源:农业经济及推广学类
首页 - 其他论文 - 本页网址:https://www.woailunwen.com/qita/72845/

研究生: 王志文
研究生(外文): Chih-Wen Wang
论文名称: 农渔会信用部对全国农业金库制度信任之研究
论文名称(外文): Study on the institutional trust of Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations to Agricultural Bank of Taiwan
指导教授: 萧崑杉萧崑杉引用关係
学位类别: 博士
校院名称: 国立台湾大学
系所名称: 农业推广学研究所
学门: 农业科学学门
学类: 农业经济及推广学类
论文种类: 学术论文
论文出版年: 2005
毕业学年度: 93
语文别: 中文
论文页数: 167
中文关键词: 制度信任、农业金融、农渔会信用部、全国农业金库
外文关键词: Institutional Trust、Agricultural Finance、Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations、Agricultural Bank of Taiwan


2005年设立的“全国农业金库”是我国农业金融体系划时代的里程碑,在这个全新的体系中,最受人瞩目的议题莫过于农渔会信用部对全国农业金库连结关係之制度信任。为了在全国农业金库与农渔会信用部之间架构一个成功与稳定的连结关係,需要进行一连串的决策与行动,藉以使合作双方建立足够的制度信任,这些决策与行动可以反映在以下的研究目的中:一、分析农渔会信用部与全国农业金库间连结关係的制度信任之影响因素;二、探讨农渔会信用部对全国农业金库的制度信任类型。
经由理论论述与文献分析,本研究提出组织规模、组织环境、社会网络、参与程度与投资额度等五个自变项,再进一步将全国农业金库模式的制度信任解构为法规信任、体制信任与成长信任等三个依变项,并建立如下的假设:
一、农渔会信用部的组织规模越大,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高。
二、农渔会信用部所处的组织环境竞争程度越高,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度也越高。
三、农渔会信用部的社会网络参与程度越高,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高。
四、农渔会信用部对金库筹设的过程参与越多,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高。
五、农渔会信用部对金库的投资额度越大,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高。
本研究以量化分析为主,质性分析为辅,两者相辅相成。量化研究的部份以问卷调查有投资全国农业金库的农渔会理事长、总干事与信用部主任,并以结构方程模型加以分析,运用之统计软体为SPSS、SAS与LISREL。质性研究部分则以深度访谈十位产、官、学界之专家,并将访谈资料以扎根理论加以分析。
研究结果显示,在质性研究部分,足以支持将全国农业金库模式的制度信任解构为法规信任、体制信任与成长信任等三部份。在量化研究的部分则为,研究假设一:农渔会信用部的组织规模越大,则其对全国农业金库模式的体制信任呈现负相关。研究假设二:农渔会信用部所处的组织环境竞争程度越高,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度也越高,并不成立。研究假设三:农渔会信用部的社会网络参与程度越高,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高,这个研究假设是被接受的。研究假设四:农渔会信用部对金库筹设的过程参与越多,则其对全国农业金库模式的制度信任程度越高,这个研究假设也是被接受的。研究假设五:农渔会信用部对金库的投资额度越大,则其对全国农业金库模式的机制信任与成长信任的程度越高,这个假设也是被接受的。
本研究最后针对理论、文献、方法与结果提出结论与建议。
关键词:制度信任、农业金融、农渔会信用部、全国农业金库


Agricultural Bank of Taiwan(ABT) was set up in the year of 2005 that is epochal milestone for Taiwan agriculture financial system. In this brand new system, the most important issue is the institutional trust relationship between Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations and ABT. To build up this successful and stable connecting relationship that is necessary making a serious of strategy and action. These strategy making and actions could reflect into this research purpose and are as following:
1.To analysis the influence factors on institutional trust between Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations and ABT.
2.To discuss institutional trust type between Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations and ABT.


Through theory description and reference analysis, there are five independent variables are brought up in this research that are organizational scope, organizational environment, social network, participation degree, and investment amount. Moreover, dissolved the institutional trust of ABT into three dependent variables, which are regulation trust, mechanism trust, and growth trust. There are five assumptions was build up are as following:
1.Farmers and Fishermen Associations that got more large credit department have more high institutional trust degree to ABT.
2. Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher competition degree in organizational environment that have higher institutional trust degree to ABT.
3. Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in social network participation that has higher institutional trust degree to ABT.
4. Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in participation of setting up ABT that has higher institutional trust degree to ABT.
5. Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in investment Agricultural Bank that has higher institutional trust degree to ABT.


In this research is the main character is quantitative analysis and the qualitative analysis as the coordinated. Quantitative research is partly with questionnaire to investigate the chairman, CEO, and Director of Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations, which invest in ABT. To analyze Structural Equation modeling and use SPSS, SAS, and LISREL as statistic software. In qualitative research adopted depth interview meeting ten specialists in production, official officer, and scholar.


In the research result, under the qualitative research, separated institutional trust into regulation trust, mechanism trust, and growth trust into three parts. In the quantitative research, the result of research assumption are as following:
1.Farmers and Fishermen Associations that got negative correlation on mechanism trust of ABT.
2.Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in organizational environment that have higher institutional trust degree to ABT. This is not accepted.
3.Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in social network participation that has higher institutional trust degree to ABT. This is acceptable.
4.Credit Department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in participation during set up Agricultural Bank that has higher institutional trust degree to ABT. And this is also acceptable.
5.Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations have higher degree in investment Agricultural Bank that has higher mechanism and growth trust to ABT. This is also acceptable.


Finally, in this research, I will address conclusion and suggestion on theory, reference, methodology and result.


Key words:Institutional Trust, Agricultural Finance, Credit department of Farmers and Fishermen Associations, Agricultural Bank of Taiwan


第一章 绪论………………………………………………1
第一节 研究缘起…………………………………………………1
第二节 研究问题与研究目的……………………………………4
第二章 理论与相关文献…………………………………8
第一节 台湾农业金融制度之沿革………………………………9
第二节 日本农业金融制度之探讨………………………………15
第三节 全国农业金库模式的网络组织与制度信任……………34
第四节 影响全国农业金库模式制度信任的因素………………70
第三章 研究方法…………………………………………76
第一节 方法论……………………………………………………76
第二节 研究架构与研究假设……………………………………89
第三节 研究工具与样本之选取…………………………………95
第四章 全国农业金库与农渔会信用部之信任分析……97
第一节 样本资料分析……………………………………………97
第二节 组织规模、组织环境、社会网络、参与程度与
投资额度对制度信任的影响分析 ……………………106
第三节 农渔会信用部与全国农业金库制度信任之质性分析…113
第五章 结论与建议………………………………………124
第一节 结论………………………………………………………124
第二节 建议………………………………………………………127
参考文献 ……………………………………………………132
附录一 研究问卷 …………………………………………149
附录二 日本JA银行基本方针……………………………154


图表目录
图一 研究架构………………………………………………………94
图二 研究架构………………………………………………………109
表一 相关係数表……………………………………………………87
表二 各种配适度指标的比较表……………………………………88
表三 本研究各潜在变项及其测量…………………………………92
表四 存款总额之次数百分比………………………………………97
表五 放款总额之次数百分比………………………………………98
表六 淨值之次数百分比……………………………………………99
表七 员工数之次数百分比…………………………………………99
表八 城乡差距之次数百分比………………………………………100
表九 金融机构数之次数百分比……………………………………100
表十 社会网络之次数百分比………………………………………101
表十一 参与程度之次数百分比……………………………………101
表十二 投资额度之次数百分比……………………………………102
表十三 目标认同之次数百分比……………………………………102
表十四 控制与惩罚之次数百分比…………………………………103
表十五 合作利益之次数百分比……………………………………103
表十六 风险分担之次数百分比……………………………………104
表十七 资讯移转之次数百分比……………………………………104
表十八 才能精熟之次数百分比……………………………………105
表十九 研究架构整体配适度指标…………………………………110
表二十 研究架构参数估计表………………………………………111


JA银行基本方针(2004),《监察手帐》,日本:全国农业协同组合中央会。
王国川与翁千惠(2003),《图解SAS在资料分析上之应用》。台北:
五南图书出版股份有限公司。
王志成(1991),“日本农业金融体系之研究”,基层金融研究发展丛书之 三十,基层金融研究训练中心编印。
王秀云(2004),“连锁加盟体系中法理契约认知差异、非法理规范与合作绩效之关联性研究---以便利商店为例”,南台科技大学论文。
今藤洋海(2002),“日本农协金融部门不良债权处理之经验”,全国农业金融会议实录,行政院经济建设委员会。
田中久义(2004),“农业金融管理制度、经济交流及座谈---会议实录”,台湾金融研训院。
司徒达贤 (2001),《策略管理新论---观念架构与分析方法》。台北:
智胜文化公司。
全国农业金库营业计划书-草案(2004),全国农业金库股份有限公司筹备处。
朱宗亮(1989),“农会信用部资金之管理”,基层金融,第十八期。
巫进益(2004),“我国农业金融法政治过程研究:政策网络理论分析”,
国立中正大学政治学系未出版论文。。
佐佐木隆(2004),“农业金融管理制度、经济交流及座谈---会议实录”,台湾金融研训院。
吕玲香(2004),“日本农林中金访问报告”,行政院农业委员会。
吕科政(2002),“伙伴关係对企业採用电子市集之影响”,元智大学论文。
何友晖、陈淑娟、赵志裕(1991),“关係取向:为中国社会心理方法论求答案”,扬国枢、黄光国主编,《中国人的心理与行为》。台北:桂冠图书公司。
何兆武译(1987),《卢梭---社会契约论》。台北:唐山出版社。
沉有忠(2005),“制度制约下的行政与立法关係:以我国九七宪改后的宪政运作为例”,政治科学论丛,第二十三期。
李宛蓉译(2004),《信任Trust》,Francis Fukuyama著,台北:文绪文化事业有公司。
李智仁(2005),“我国农业金融改革法制初探”。存款保险资讯季刊,
第18卷第一期。
李信贤(2004),“信任对跨组织资讯系统使用的影响---B计昼供应商观点”,国立中央大学论文。
李宜芳(2002),“关係与连结---IF态的提出:由电子市集为例分析网路新工具的社会学意义”,国立清华大学论文。
李锦屏(2002),“台湾中小企业协力关係组合,厂商特性与合作厂商信任程度关係之研究”,实践大学论文。
吴思华(1997),《策略九说:策略思考的本质》。台北:麦田出版社。
吴明隆与涂金堂(2005),《SPSS与统计应用分析》。台北:
五南图书出版股份有限公司。
吴芝仪与廖梅花译(2001),《质性研究入门:扎根理论研究方法》,Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin著。台北:涛石文化事业有限公司。
吴芝仪与李奉儒译(1999),《质的评鑑与研究》,Michael Quinn Patton著。台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司。
邱皓政(2005),《结构方程模式---LISREL 的理论、技术与应用》。台北:
双叶书廊有限公司。
金耀基(1980),“人际关係中的人济分析”,第一届国际汉学会议研讨会论文集, 台北:中央研究院。
林 南(2001),“社会资本:争鸣的范式和实证的检验”,香港:社会学学报, 2期。
周文贤 (2001),《多变量统计分析---SAS/STAT 之应用》。台北:智胜文化公司。
周业谦与周光淦译(1998),《社会学辞典》,David Jary & Julia Jary著。台北:猫头鹰出版社。
金耀基 (1992),“关係和网络的建构”,《中国社会与文化》(金耀基主编)。香港:牛津大学出版社。
林宗镛(2003),“农会信用部经营问题与组织改革之分析---从公司治理观点”,逢甲大学未出版论文
林家五(1999), 《企业主持人的释意历程及其影响》。国立台湾大学商学研究所博士论文。
林敦彬(2003),“正式与非正式控制机制对合伙关係合作效能之影响---以律师事务所为例”,元智大学论文。
林董祥(2000),“影响供应链伙伴关係相关因素之研究---以半导体供应链为例”,国立中央大学论文。
邵 琳(1996),“行销通路成员信任---承诺模式之研究:台湾汽车产业之实证”,铭传大学未出版论文。
洪伟峻(2004),“母公司间之互动关係对国际合资事业绩效影响之探讨”,
铭传大学论文。
胡玮珊译(1999),《知识管理---企业组织如何有效运用知识》。台北:
中国生产力中心。
胡幼慧主编(2004),《质性研究:理论、方法及本土女性研究实例》。台北:巨流图书有限公司。
夏铸九与王志弘等校译(2000),《网络社会之堀起》,Manuel Castells著,台北:唐山出版社。
徐宗国(1986):由田野研究资料建立扎根的理论。国立台湾大学社会期刊,18。
徐宗国译(2004),《质性研究概论》,Anselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin著。台北:巨流图书有限公司。
徐向艺(1996),“日本主银行体系及企业与银行关係市埸化分析”,中国:
《山东金融》一月号。
梁成金(2002),“农业(金库)银行组织方式与农渔会信用部改革之建议”,全国农业金融会议实录,行政院经济建设委员会。
殷文译(2005),《第8个习惯》,Stephen R. Covey著,台北:天下远见出版股份有限公司。
许史金译(2001),《知识管理推行实务》。台北:商周出版。
许志光(1995),“共同研发联盟之信任机制与承诺类型对联盟绩效关係之研究”,中原大学未出版论文。
许人文(1992),“研究发展联盟之组织过程与管理方式探讨---以电子业为例”,辅仁大学未出版论文。
张维安 (2001),《台湾的企业组织结构与竞争力》。台北:联经出版社。
张苙云(1986),《组织社会学》。台北:三民书局股份有限公司。
张苙云主编(1999),《网络台湾:企业的人情关係与经济理性》。台北:
远流出版事业股份有限公司。:
张苙云与吕玉瑕、王甫昌主编(1997),《九O年代的台湾社会---社会变迁基本调查研究系列二 (下)》。台北:中央研究院社会学研究所筹备处。
张捷昌(1996),“日本农业金融机构经营危机之探讨”,台湾经济金融月刊第32卷第五期。
张荣华(2003),“组织公平、组织信任与组织承诺影响关係之研究”,
国立海洋大学论文。
农林中央金库法(2005),http://law.e-gov.go.jp。
汤宗勳译(2004),《信任游戏》,Diane Tracy著,早安财经文化出版。
黄孝如译(2004),《我们为什麽不再信任》,Onora O’Neill著。台北:早安财经文化有限公司。
黄惠雯、童婉芬、梁文蓁、林兆卫译(2003),《最新质性方法与研究》。台北:韦伯文化国际出版有限公司。
黄芳铭(2004),《社会科学统计方法学-结构方程模式》。台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司。
黄光国(1988),“人情与面子:中国人的权力游戏”,《中国人的权力游戏》。台北:巨流图书公司。
黄幸雯(2001),“行销通路伙伴间信任与控制对绩效影响之研究---以资讯业为例”,大叶大学论文。
黄泰焜(1998),“信任、策略联盟型态与联盟绩效关係之研究---以在台设有总公司、分公司或办事机构的航空客运公司为例”,国立海洋大学未出版论文。
黄富国(2001),“加盟连锁体系中个人加盟动机对合作关係影响之研究”,
淡江大学论文。
黄菁玮(2000),“个人对个人线上交易之信任机制对交易满意度之影响”,
国立中正大学论文。
陈锦文(1985),光复以来台湾农会重要事业成就研究(上)(下),
台湾经济,第104期、第105期。
陈介玄(1994),《协力网络与生活结构---台湾中小企业的社会经济分析》。台北:联经出版社。
(1995),《货币网络与生活结构---地方金融、中小企业与台湾世俗社会之转化》。台北:联经出版社。
(1998),《台湾产业的社会学研究---转型中的中小企业》。台北:
联经出版社。
陈振烜(2005),《信任与文化---人性化过程与文化产业发展》。台北:
理得出版有限公司。
陈佑铭(2003),“跨组织非正式互动、信任与资源交换关係之研究”,
辅仁大学论文。
陈玉錡(2001),“策略联盟的厂商间互动关係之研究---关係资本观点”,
铭传大学论文。
陈永琦(2001),“从制度经济学分析我国农会信用部之经营问题
与改进方向”,台湾金融财务季刊,第2卷第3期。
(2001),“农会信用部改进方案比较及未来远景”,
台湾经济金融月刊,第37卷第11期。
陈郁雯(2000),“台湾中小企业策略联盟绩效影响因素之研究”,铭传大学论文。
陈昕哲(2000),“国际策略联盟信赖关係之研究”,淡江大学论文。
陈焕文(1996),“行销通路组织间关係交易形式之研究---以台北市超级市场例”,淡江大学未出版论文。
冯艾玲(1997),“关于日本主银行制的考察与思考”。中国:《财贸经济》1997 第一期。
冯镇邦(2000),“建立顾客信任的服务行销策略---以信用卡为例”,
国立政治大学论文。
冯嘉宜(1998),“资讯系统委外承包商与外包商间伙伴关係形成之研究”,
屏东科技大学未出版论文。
曾纪幸 (1996),《多国籍企业在台子公司网路组织型态及其母公司管理机制选择之关係》,国立政治大学未岀版论文。
费孝通(1948),《乡土中国与乡土重建》,上海:观察社。
雷立芬(1995),“农会信用部对台湾农村经济发展之影响”,台湾大学农经所。
杨中芳主编(2001),《中国人的人际关係、情感与信任---一个人际交住的观点》。台北:远流出版事业股份有限公司。
杨长春(1997),“策略联盟伙伴间行为、信任与联盟绩效相关之研究”,
淡江大学未出版论文。
叶勇助(2001),“信任在网络(双方)统制结构之角色”,元智大学未出版论文。
赵碧华与朱美珍编译(2000),《研究方法---社会工作暨人文科学领域的运用》,Allen Rubin & Earl Babbie著。台北:学富文化事业有限公司。
廖朝贤(1995),八十三年台澎金马地区各级农会营运分析,农政与农情,39期。
(1999),“研修农会法的迷思---金融农会法?农民农会法?”,
金融财务,第3期。
廖坤荣(2002),“台湾农会经营管理的困境:网络理论的分析”,政治科学论丛,第十六期。
(2004),“台湾农会的社会资本形成与政策绩效”,政治科学论丛,第二十二期。
廖英英(2004),“合作情境因素、信任与管理机制之配适对绩效之影响---以台湾地区保险经代公司为例”,实践大学论文。
黎士群(1998),“组织公平、信任与知识分享行为之关係性研究---以Unix系统管理人员为例”,铭传大学未出版论文。
熊欣华(2001),“组织间合作的信心管理”,国立政治大学未出版论文。
刘 毅(2003),“日本的主银行制与银企关係”,中国:日本研究,2003年第四期。
刘家森(1996),“国际策略联盟成员文化差异,联盟管理整合机制,信任关係与绩效之研究:以台湾北导体业为例”,国立成功大学未出版论文。
蔡松煇(2004),“救灾人员之团队信任、工作压力与工作调适之关係研究”,
大叶大学未出版论文
潘思云(1997),“保险公司与保险辅助人公司相互信任知觉,信任行为表现与组织间绩效的关係”,铭传大学未出版论文。
阎云翔(2000),《礼物的流动:一个中国村庄中的互惠原则和社会网络》,上海人民出版社。
萧崑杉(2004),“才能精熟及其相关理论”,农业推广文彙,第49辑。
赖英照(1999),“农会信用部改革方案之评析”,华信金融季刊,第八期。
简守邦译(2003),《最新社会科学研究的理论与方法》,Derek Layder著。台北:韦伯文化国际出版有限公司。
谢依静(2000),“关係结合策略与关係绩效关联性之研究---以金融服务业为例”,国立台湾大学论文。
罗家德(1997),“为什麽硅谷能击败128公路区-以人际关係网络观点探讨网优势”,中山管理评论,5卷2期。
郑伯壎与刘怡君 (1995),“义利之辨与企业间的交易历程:台湾组织间网络的个案分析”,《组织心理与行为》(杨国枢主编),本土心理学研究,第4期,页2-41。台北:台湾大学心理学系本土心理学研究室。
郑伯壎、任金刚、张慧芳、郭建志(1997),“台湾企业关係网络中的对偶关係:关係形成与关係效能”。中华心理学刊,39卷,1期。
郑伯壎、张慧芳、郭建志(1997),“领导者之部属归类、信任及管理行为:员工归类模式之验证”。第二届国际华人心理学家学术研讨会发表之论文。
郑伯壎与姜定宇、郑弘岳主编(2003),《组织行为研究在台湾:三十年回顾与展望》。台北:桂冠图书股份有限公司。
Andrew, S. B. Basler, C. R. & Coller, X.(1999). Organizational structure, cultures and identities: Overlaps and divergences. Research in the Sociology of Organization, 16,213-236.
Aulakh, P. S., M. Kotabe, and A. Sahay (1997), “Trust and performance in crossborder marketing partnerships : A behavior approach,”In P. W. Beamish & J. P. Killing (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies: North American Perspectives, pp. 163-196, San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
Barber, B.(1983). The logic and limit of trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Barley, Stephen, John Freeman, and Ralph Hybels. (1992) "Strategic Alliances in Commercial Biotechnology". in Nitin Nohria and Robert G. Eccles, Networks and Organizations. Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
Barnard, C. I. (1938), The Function of Executive, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business University Press.
Becker, H.(1970). Sociological work: Method and substance. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Bian, Y.(1997). Being strong ties back in: Indirect connection, bridges, and job search in China. American Sociological Review, 62,366-385.
Bleeke, J. and D. Ernst (1995), “Is your strategic alliance really a sale, “Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 97-105.
Bradach, J. L. and R. G. Eccles (1989), “Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms, ”Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 15, pp.97-118.
Brass, J.(1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.
Brecker, S. J.(1990). Applications of covarience structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260-273.
Breitmayer, B. J., Ayers, L., & Knafl, K. A.(1993). Triangulation in qualitative research: Evaluation of completeness and confirmation purposes. Image, 25, 237-243.
Buckley, P. J. and M. Casson (1988), “A theory of cooperation in intermational business, ”In F. J. Contractor and P. Lorange (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, pp. 31-54, San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
Burt, R. S.
(1987),Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92,1287-1335.
(1992),Structural holes. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University.
(1997),The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly,42, 339-365.
(2000),The network structure of social capital. In Sutton, R. I. and Staw, B. M.(Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 22. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
(2001),Attachment, decay, and social network. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 619-643.
Charmaz, K.(1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. Emerson(Eds.), Contemporary field research(pp. 109-126). Boston: Little, Brown. Charmaz, K.(1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
(1995). Grounded theory. In J. Smith, R. Hane, & L. Longenhore(Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology(pp. 27-49). London: Sage.
Clark, M. & Payne, R. L.(1997). The nature and structure of workers’ trust in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 205-224.
Clarke, A.(1990). A social worlds research adventure. In S. Cozzens & T. Gieryn (Eds.), Theories of science in society(pp. 15-35). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A.(1984). Collaboration: Couples working together to manage chronic illness. Image, 16, 109-115.
Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cuevas, N. M., Dinero, T. E., & Feit, M. D.(1996). Reading qualitative research from a methodological point of view. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 8, 73-96.
Das, T. K. and B. S. Teng (1998a), “Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances, ”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 491-512.
Das, T. K. and B. S. Teng(1998b). “Resource . and risk management in the strategic alliance making process,”Journal of Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 21-42.
Dasgupta, Partha(1988)“Trust as a commodity” in trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by Diego Gambetta. MA: Brasil Blackwell.
Davern, M.(1997),Social network and economic sociology: A proposed research agenda for a more complete science. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56(3),287-302.
Deeds, D. L. and C. W. L. Hill (1999), “An examination of opportunistic action within research alliances: Evidence from the biotechnology industry,”Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 141-163.
Deutsch, M.(1958). Trust and society. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
Dubois, A. and H. Hakansson (1997), “Relationships as activity links,”In M. Ebers(Ed.),The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks, pp. 43-65, New York: Oxford University Press.
Dutton, J. E., J. M. Dukerich, and C. V. Harquail(1994), “Oranizational images and member identification,”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 239-263.
Dyer, J. H. (1997), “Effective interfirm collavoration: How firms minimize transacation costs and maximize transaction value,”Strategic Manatement Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 535-556.
Ebers, M. and A. Grandori(1997), “The forms, costs, and developmene dynamics of inter-organizational networking,”In M. Ebers(Ed.), The Formation of Inter-Organization Networks, pp. 265-286, New York: Oxford University Press.
Emirbater, M. & Goodwin, J.(1994),Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1411-1454.
Farth, J. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K. R., & Cheng, B. S.(1998). The influence of relational demography and quanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4), 471-488.
Fujimura, J. H.(1988). The molecular biological bandwagon in cancer research. Social Problem, 35, 261-283.
Gephart, R. R. Jr.(1988). Ethnostatistics: Qualitative foundations for quantitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Geringer, J. M. and L. Hebert(1989), “Control and performance of intermational joint ventures,”Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 235-254.
Glaister, K. W. and P. J. Buckley(1996), “Strategic motives for international alliance formation,”Journal of Manatement Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 301-332.
Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. A.(1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw(Eds.). Research in organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CO:JAI Press.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F.(1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
Gulati, R. (1995), “Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances,”Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 85-112.
Hart, P. and C. Saunders (1997), “Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange,”Organization Science, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 23-42.
Hennart, J. F.
(1988), “A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures,” Strategic Manatement Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 361-374.
(1989), “Can the new forms of investment substitute for the old forms? A transaction costs perspective,”Journal of International Business Studies., Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 211-233.
(1991), “The transaction cost theory of the multinational enterprise,” In C. Pitelis and R. Sugde(Eds.), The Narture of the Transnational Firm, pp. 81-115, London: Routledge.
(1993), “Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy,” Organization Science, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 529-547.
Hill. C. W. L. (1990) “Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 500-513.
Hodson, R.(1997). Group relations at work: Solidarity, conflict, and relations management. Work and Organizations, 24, 426-452.
Holm, D. B., K. Eriksson, and J. Johanson (1999), “Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 467-486.
Hosmer, L. T. (1995), “Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 376-403.
Hurlbert, J. S.(1991). Social network, social circles, and job satisfaction. Work and Occupation, 18, 415-430.
Inkpad, A. C. and P. W. Beamish(1997), “Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 177-202.
Jones, C., W. S. Hesterly, and S. P. Borgatti (1997), “A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22, No. 4. pp. 911-945.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky(1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,”Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp.263-291.
Klein, B. (1980), “Transaction cost determinants of unfair contractual arrangements,”Ameriacan Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 356-362.
Knoke, D. & Kuklinski, J. H.(1982). Network analysis, Sage University paper 28.
Kogut, B.(1988), “Joint ventures: Theoreticel and empirical perspectives,”Strategic Manatement Journal, Vol. 94(Winter), pp. 319-332.
Kuchinke, K. P.,(1997), Employee expertise: The Status of the theory and the literature, Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(4), 72-77.
Krackhardt, D. & Brass, D.(1994). Intraorganizational Networks-The micro side. In S. Waserman & J. Galaskewicx(Eds.). Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences, 207-229. London: Sage Publications.
Krackhardt, D. & Porter, L. W.(1986). When friends leave:A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 242-261.
Kramer, R. M.(1996). Divergent realities and convergent disappointment in the hierarchic relation: Trust and the intuitive auditor at work. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler(Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research(pp. 216-245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lane, C. and R. Bachmann(1997), “Co-operation in inter-firm relations in Britain and Germany: the role of social institutions,” British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 226-254.
Laumann, E.Galskeiwicz, & Marsden, P.V.(1978). Community structure as interorganizational linkages. Annual Review of Sociology, 4, 455-484.
Lofland, J.(1971). Analyzing social setting. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Luhmann, N.(1988), “Familiarity, confidence, trust:Problems and alternatives,”In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, pp. 94-107, New York: Basil Blackwell.
Madhok, A. (1995), “Revisiting multinational firms’tolerance for joint ventures: A trust-based approach,”Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117-137.
Madhok, A. and S. B. Tallman(1998), “Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 326-339.
Masten, S. E. (1984), “The organization of production: Evidence form the aerospace industry,”Jorunal of Law and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 2, No. 2, pp. 403-417.
Meyer, John W. and W. Richard Scott,(1983), Organizational Environment: Ritual and Rationality, Beverly Hills: Sage Publication.
Miles, M. & Huberman, A.(1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Morse, J. M.(1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
Miller, K. D. (1992), “A framework for intergrated risk management in international business,”Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 311-332.
Morgan, R., & Hunt, S. D.(1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A.(1995). Qualitative research methods for health professional(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murdaugh, C. L.(1987). Nursing Research: Theory generating through methodologicl flexibility Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 1(4),81-84.
Nohria N. and R. G. Eccles.(1992). Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School press.
North, Douglass.(1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parkhe, A. (1991), “Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 579-101.
Parry, S. B.(1996), The quest for competences: Competency studies can help you make HR decision, but the results as good as the study, Training, 33, 48-56.
Patton, M. Q.,(1985).Culture and Evaluation. Vol. 25, New Directions for Program Evaluation. San Franciico: Jossey –Bass.
Porter, M. E.(1980), Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press.
Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput, and L. Smith-Doerr(1996), “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology,”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp.116-145.
Provan, K. G., J. M. Beyer, and Kruytbosch(1980), “Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp.200-225
Raven, B.H.(1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M.Fishbein(Eds.).Current studies in social psychology, 371-382. New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston.
Reed, R. and R. J. DeFillippi(1990), “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage,”Acad emy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 88-102.
Ring, P. S. and A. H. Van de Ven(1994), “Developmental process of cooperative interorganizational relationships,”Academy of Management Review, Vol.19,No. 1, pp. 90-118.
Rotter, J. B.(1967). A new scale for the measurementof interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
Rubin, A. & Babbie, E.(2000), Research Methods for Social Work, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Sabel, C. F.(1993). Studied Trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133-1170.
Saxenian, Annalee.(1994). Regional Advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scott, S. G. and V. R. Lane (2000), “A stakeholder approach to organizational identity,”Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 43-62.
Schatzman, L., & Strauss. A.(1973). Field research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Schneider, J., & Conrad, P.(1983). Having epilepsy: The experience and control of the illness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Seibert,R,T.Kraimer, M.L.& Liden, R.C.(2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Jowrnal,44, 219-2367.
Shapiro, Susan P.(1988)”The social control of impersonal trust.”American Journal of sociology 93(3):623-658.
Simon, H. A. (1962), “The architecture of complexity,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106(December), pp. 467-482.
Simonin, B. L. (1999), “Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances,”Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp.595-623.
Simpson, B. J.,(1996), The Classification of Educational Objective, Psychomotor Domain, Illinois Teacher of Home Economics, 10:110-114.
Sohn, J. H. D.(1994),“Social knowledge as a control system: A proposition and evidence from the Japanese FDI behavior,” Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 295-324.
Sparrowe, R,T.Linder,R,C.& Kraimer, M.L.(2001).Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
Star, S. L.(1989). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty.
Star, S. L. & Ruhleder, k.(1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Problems of design and access in large-scale information systems. Information Systems Research, 7, 27-57.
Stoof, Angela et al,(2002), A boundary approach of competence: A constructivist approach aid for understanding and using the concept of competence, Human Resource Development Review, Vol.1, No.3.
Stump, R. L. and J. B. Heide(1996), “Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships, “Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33—(November), pp. 431-441.
Tallman, S. B. and O. Shenkar(1994), “A manaterial decision model of international cooperative venture formation,”Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 91-113.
Tichy,N.M.(1981). Networks in organizations. In W.H.Starbuck & P.C.Nystrom(Eds.). Handbook of organizational design:Remodeling organiationasl and their environments, 2, 225-249.New Your,Oxford University Press.
Walters, B. A., S. Peters and G. G. Dess(1994), “Strategic alliances and joint ventures: Making them work,”Business Horizons, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 5-10.
Watson, G.W.& Papamacrcos, S.D.(2002).Social capital and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(4),537-552.
Wheatley, M.J.& Kellner-Roger, M.(1996). Self-organization:The irresistible future of organizing. Strategy & Leadership, 24(4),18-24.
Williams, B. (1998), “Formal structures and social reality,”In D. Gambetta(Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking of Cooperative Relations, pp. 3-13, Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Williamson, O. E.(1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E.(1985), The Economic Instititions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York; The Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1991), “Comparative economic organization: An analysis of discrete structural alternatives,”Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 269-296.
Wilson, Frank L.(2002). “The Study of Political Institutions.”In New Directions in Comparatives Politics, ed. Howard J. Wiarda. Cambridge: Westview Press.
Wrightsman,L. S.(1992). Assumptions about human nature: implications for researchers and practitioners. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Xin, K. R,& Pearce, J. L.(1996).Guanxi:Connections as substitutes for structural support. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1641-1658.
Yang, M. M. H.(1994). Gifts, favors, banquets:The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca:Cornell University Press.
Zaheer, A., B. McEvily, and V. Perrone(1998), “Does trust mattar? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance,”Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 141-159.
Zajac, E. J. and C. P. Olsen(1993), “From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of interorganizational strategies,”Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 131-145.
Zucker, Lynne G.(1986)“Production of trust: institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920.” Research in Organizational Behavior 8:53-111.

累计有19527人觉得此论文有用

免责声明

农渔会信用部对全国农业金库制度信任之研究
本文内容整理自网络,有修改,版权归原作者所有。如有侵权,我们将立即更正或删除相关内容。
联系邮箱 webmaster(#at)woailunwen.com [ (#at)改为@ ]
制度信任 农业金融 农渔会信用部 全国农业金库

网友回答

还没有人提问农渔会信用部对全国农业金库制度信任之研究,现在提问沙发就是你的!
点击加载更多